Flight Safety: Is It Time for the Industry to Refocus on the Basics?
Recent aviation accidents have raised concerns about whether the industry needs to revisit fundamental safety practices. While technological advancements continue to improve overall safety, the occurrence of high-profile incidents suggests that a renewed focus on basic safety protocols might be necessary.
Recent Flight Safety Statistics and Trends
The following statistics and trends highlight the current state of aviation safety:
- Fatal Accidents in 2024: 16 fatal accidents occurred globally, resulting in 333 fatalities, marking the deadliest year since 2018.
- General Aviation vs. Commercial Flights: General aviation accounted for 78% of crashes, with 45% involving fatalities, primarily due to the higher volume of general aviation operations.
- Global Accident Rate: 1.87 accidents per million departures, compared to 2.05 in 2023.
- Fatality Rate: 17 people per billion passengers globally.
Key Causes of Accidents:
| Cause | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Pilot error | 55% |
| Mechanical failures | 17% |
| Weather-related issues | 13% |
| Sabotage | 8% |
| Air traffic control & others | 7% |
Key Trends in Aviation Safety
Technological Advancements
The industry continues to adopt advanced safety systems such as AI-powered runway management tools and enhanced avionics like terrain awareness systems and real-time data sharing. These innovations aim to reduce risks during critical phases of flight.
Rise in Minor Incidents
While fatal crashes remain rare, there has been an increase in minor incidents and near-misses. For example, a Japan Airlines aircraft recently clipped a Delta Air Lines plane on the ground in Seattle, highlighting the need for stricter ground operation protocols.
Runway Safety Concerns
Recent incidents, such as the Jeju Air crash in South Korea, have drawn attention to runway infrastructure and operational challenges during landings and takeoffs.
Recent Major Accidents
Jeju Air Flight 2216 Crash (29 December 2024)
A Boeing 737-800 operated by Jeju Air crashed at Muan International Airport in South Korea after a bird strike caused engine failure and hydraulic malfunctions. The aircraft belly-landed without deploying its landing gear, overshot the runway, and collided with a concrete embankment housing navigational equipment. Tragically, 179 of the 181 people aboard lost their lives, making it the deadliest aviation accident involving a South Korean airliner since 1997.
Washington Midair Collision (29 January 2025)
An American Airlines regional jet collided with a U.S. Army helicopter near Ronald Reagan National Airport, killing all 67 people aboard both aircraft. Miscommunication between air traffic controllers and the helicopter crew is suspected as a contributing factor.
Philadelphia Medical Plane Crash (31 January 2025)
A medical Learjet crashed shortly after takeoff from Philadelphia International Airport, killing six onboard and one person on the ground.
Other Incidents
A missing Cessna in Alaska with ten passengers highlights risks in smaller aircraft operations, while ground collisions in Seattle and engine fires during takeoff in Houston have also raised concerns.
Has the Industry Lost Focus on the Fundamentals?
These incidents raise a critical question: Has the aviation industry become overly reliant on technology at the expense of basic safety principles? While advancements in automation and artificial intelligence have significantly improved safety, over reliance on such systems can sometimes lead to complacency among pilots, crew, and even regulators.
The Washington midair collision raises concerns about situational awareness and communication protocols. Despite decades of training and procedural refinements, communication errors between air traffic controllers and pilots remain a leading cause of preventable accidents. Should the industry introduce more intensive real-world scenario training that tests pilots’ decision-making skills in high-pressure environments?
Moreover, incidents like the Philadelphia medical plane crash and the missing Cessna in Alaska highlight the ongoing risks in general aviation and emergency medical flights. These cases reinforce the need for more stringent safety oversight in smaller operations, where resources and regulatory enforcement may not be as rigorous as in commercial aviation.
Time to Refocus: Strengthening the Foundations of Flight Safety
As the aviation industry moves forward, it may be time to re-evaluate training methodologies and safety protocols to ensure that the fundamentals of flight safety are not overshadowed by technological advancements.
Reinforcing Basic Flying Skills
- Pilots should undergo more frequent manual flying exercises to prevent over reliance on automation.
- Simulated more emergency scenarios should include failures that force pilots to rely on core flying skills. POSITIVE AIRCRAFT CONTROL.
Enhancing Decision-Making and Communication Training
- Leadership training and crew resource management (CRM) should be further emphasised.
- ATC and pilot communication protocols should be refined to reduce misinterpretation risks.
Addressing Human Factors and Mental Resilience
- Psychological resilience and stress management should be part of pilot training.
- Decision-making under pressure should be tested in unpredictable, high-stakes training scenarios.
Stricter Oversight on General Aviation and Regional Airlines
- More standardised training for general aviation pilots could help reduce human error-related incidents.
The aviation industry has made tremendous strides in safety, but recent events serve as a stark reminder that technology alone is not enough—fundamental flight skills, human decision-making, and effective training remain the pillars of a safe aviation system. Is it time for the industry to go back to basics before another major accident forces change?
Key Takeaway Questions
- How can modern training methodologies be structured to reduce complacency while reinforcing human performance, situational awareness, and adaptability in high-stakes environments?
- Is the current approach to pilot training and standardisation evolving in step with industry advancements? Are new generations of pilots and trainers fully receptive to existing systems, or is there resistance to change?
- What are the key weaknesses in current training frameworks, and what strategies can be used to systematically identify and address them for a more resilient aviation safety culture?
- Should regulators and airlines impose stricter requirements for manual flying skill retention and emergency scenario training?
- Is there an over reliance on automation in pilot training, and should there be a greater emphasis on fundamental airmanship?
References
- International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO): Global Aviation Safety Report 2024
- Preliminary Report on Jeju Air Crash: Aviation24.be
- BBC News: South Korea Plane Crash Investigation
- FlightGlobal: Airline Safety Performance Review for 2024
- Independent: Analysis of Jeju Air Bird Strike Incident
Citations:
[1] https://www.asd-europe.org/news-media/news-events/news/global-aviation-safety-report/
[2] https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/jeju-air/preliminary-report-on-jeju-air-crash-highlights-black-box-failure-and-bird-strike-evidence/
[3] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/31/flight-2216-landing-gear-and-runway-problems-flagged-as-reasons-for-crash
[4] https://www.flightglobal.com/safety/how-year-end-losses-skewed-our-review-of-airline-safety-performance-in-2024/161512.article
[5] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgzprprlyeo
[6] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/plane-crash-jeju-air-south-korea-bird-strike-cause-why-b2671345.html
[7] https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/newsroom-and-events/news/easa-publishes-annual-safety-review-2024
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeju_Air_Flight_2216
Leave a Reply